Start here
Project Bora Bora is interesting because it attacked structure before culture. Citi skipped the poster version of speed and removed places where decisions went to sit down.
The old Citi problem was not a lack of smart people. It was too many rooms, layers, checks, side channels, and inherited systems between the work and the answer.
A bank will never move like a startup. That is fine. The goal is a bank with fewer unnecessary waits.
The pressure
Banking has real friction for good reasons. Regulators, capital requirements, risk controls, and trust all slow the room down. The extra friction is the part Citi had to cut.
The scoreboard
- Management layers moved from 13 to 8. That is a structural change, not a mood change.
- Roughly 60 committees were eliminated. Fewer committees means fewer places for ownership to dissolve.
- About 20,000 roles were cut during the simplification push. The cost is real.
- The stock response showed investors believed the delay tax was finally being addressed.
- Global banking still carries regulatory and systems drag that flattening will never erase.
- The next test is whether new committees quietly grow back.
Still working
- Fraser changed the shape of the organization, not only the language.
- Fewer layers make accountability easier to find.
- The bank now has a cleaner way to judge whether decisions are moving.
Still stuck
- Legacy systems still keep old complexity alive.
- Global regulation creates friction no org chart can delete.
- After a cleanup, the organization can start rebuilding the very drag it removed.
Bottom line
At work today, take one stalled decision and write down every room it still has to visit. If more than one person can block it but nobody clearly owns it, you are looking at shelter for delay, not an alignment problem.